MrSega wrote:
CPU has little to do with it LINDBERGH's successor would have to have a higher clockspeed preformance and more memory as well as more cores.
If CPU has little to do with it then why do people ever need new computers?
What do you think that RingEdge has? Lindbergh had a Pentium 4 (single core) at 3.0ghz.
RingEdge has an Intel Pentium Dual Core (more cores) at 1.8ghz (roughly 3.6ghz)... which is... a higher clock speed.
They do have the same RAM, but, RingEdge's offers faster performance.
Its mostly all about a large techinical leap and graphical processing that can lower development costs in the same way as RINGEDGE does while providing cutting edge graphics that are groundbreaking, the same way NAOMI did in 1998.
I'm going to argue against that one. Since Microsoft and Sony are in the business of making this a 10 year console cycle, it really isn't in Sega's interest to have arcade hardware that far outshines the consoles. On one hand, Sega is trying to revitalize the arcade business, so they do want to look better than consoles. On the other hand, that revitalization isn't going well and to maximize their revenues, they're probably going to need to do some arcade ports. It's going to take them a lot more work to port a game that ran on stronger hardware, which costs more money.
Its doesn't matter if RINGEDGE is only two years old. Its not the official successor to LINDBERGH like I said, its a mid range board.Its not not out of the ordinary for SEGA to churn out a more powerful board just a couple years after a mid range upgrade. System 32 was introduced in 1992, just two years after System 24 and a full 5 years after System 16 was introduced in 1987. Model 3 came in '96, NAOMI, System 32's successor came in '98 just 2 years later and 6 years after System 32.
Fair enough on the release timeline, I just don't think Sega is going to be releasing a new arcade board, and if they do it's not going to be the quantum leap you're thinking it will be.