I wonder which of the two connections DID you prefer back when the DC was new?
Please ignore modern TVs/Monitors, where it may be a different story now... I am specifically asking about the comparison of CRT-TVs and CRT-monitors from back then.
I remember buying a VGA-box for the game Ikaruga since it was easy to turn my CRT-monitor by 90°s to the side, which was not possible with my TV and it's side-mounted speakers.
It was cool for Ikaruga, but I also remember how disappointed I was with the VGA image.
Sure, you did not get those ugly sawtooth-artifacts from interlacing with the VGA-box and also, the image was waaaaay sharper then on my TV for two reasons:
No interlacing meant no vertical blurring for deflickering, and also the monitor had a sharper image by itself since it was designed for working.
But I always felt the image was TOO sharp and very artificial, and you very much noticed the Dreamcast's non-existent anti-aliasing (disregarding a handful of SSAA-games). So you got much pixel-crawling, shimmering and stair-step-effects.
On the TV, the image was less sharp and had those interlacing-artifacts, but for me it seemed waaaaaaaaay more natural, more satisfying and almost had some kinda natural AA-qualitiy to it.
I preferred it over VGA (but admittedly I did not have the direct comparison on the SAME TV, since my TV did not support VGA but only RGB).
Maybe it was because I had one of those 100Hz-TV-sets which were not really known to provide an extra-sharp image. : D
I never liked S-Video, tho... RGB had just better, more saturated colors and did not have that color-bleeding.
So... anyone else (who could use it) preferred RGB over VGA?