Dreamcast compared to its relatives?(pics)

General Dreamcast discussion applies here. Before posting here please check the other forums in the Dreamcast section to see if your topic would fit better in those categories.

Moderator: mazonemayu

Forum rules
Please check the other forums in the Dreamcast section before posting here to see if your topic would fit better in those categories. Example: A new game/homebrew release would go in the New Releases/Homebrew/Emulation section: http://dreamcast-talk.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=5 or if you're having an issue with getting your Dreamcast to work or a game to boot it would go in the Support section: http://dreamcast-talk.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=42
cloofoofoo
MegaDeath
Posts: 230

Dreamcast compared to its relatives?(pics)

Post#1 » Thu Sep 06, 2018 9:50 pm

So I was bored a couple nights ago and decided to rip out more models( this time using demul) but this time from Naomi 2 and Sega HIkaru. The dreamcast relatives who were considered behemoths during their time. In my personal opinion the naomi 2 is shocking behemoth with what I extracted (kinda similar to the wii in polycount per frame). Hikaru on the other hand was in the same realm of the dreamcast and was surprisingly low, seems to perform more constant than the dreamcast but not by much.The the triangle count is at TRIS and its per frame.
(I dont claim these are accurate but maybe it can give you a sense of scale between the machines)

Lets start with virtua fighter 4 on the naomi 2 pushing 112,000 tris per frame compared to the ps2 I extracted that usually hit 60,000 - 90,000 per frame:
Image

Virtua striker 3 naomi 2 (gamecube reaches similar counts randomly but over all its much less ):
Image

initial d naomi 2is interesting because it recieved a psp port that ran 30 fps(arcade is 60) and usually hit 30,000 -55,000(arcade is around 120,000) triangles a frame.
Thats probably how a naomi 2 game would look on the dreamcast and thats how cut down it would probably be:
Image

Beach spikers had a gamecube port that hits around 90,000 per frame at a smooth 60fps.Gamecube is pretty powerful but I guess not enough:
Image

Last for this post for naomi 2 is soul surfer. For some reason this one doesnt push all that much polys compared to the rest( maybe in naomi 2 transparencies are still a burden like it was on the dreamcast?) Next post will be for hikaru:
Image
Last edited by cloofoofoo on Thu Sep 06, 2018 10:18 pm, edited 2 times in total.

cloofoofoo
MegaDeath
Posts: 230

Re: Dreamcast compared to its relatives?(pics)

Post#2 » Thu Sep 06, 2018 10:02 pm

Now for hikaru. Usually people make it out the end all machine who would kick naomi 2 ass up and down. That looks to be pretty far from the truth.I dunno if its doing complex physics or thousands of lights but its polygon count would be pretty at home of the dreamcast. Sega really should have put their foot down and reworked the lighting and just port the games to the dreamcast, who knows they probably would have looked fine. I would have liked to try star wars but it doesnt work. I misplaced planet harriers but it ranged from 20,000-30,000.

Air trix was pretty low for some reason usually topping out at 20,000 triangles per frame:
Image

Brave fighters first stage demo and the second shot is the intro scene with all the people cheering:
ImageImage

Nascar racer, scene from the intro with lots of cars close to the camera:
Image

cloofoofoo
MegaDeath
Posts: 230

Re: Dreamcast compared to its relatives?(pics)

Post#3 » Thu Sep 06, 2018 10:12 pm

This one might less accurate because its from nulldc but the highest I could get on the dreamcast was wacky races using 2 players split using black outline at 30 fps around 76,000 per frame(its one of the highest if not the highest in that framerate). Who knows maybe virtuas fighter 4 around a ps2 type detail at 30 fps was possible? :D

Image

User avatar
Anthony817
Shark Patrol
Posts: 1946

Re: Dreamcast compared to its relatives?(pics)

Post#4 » Fri Sep 07, 2018 1:27 am

Interesting stuff cloofoofoo, would be great if you could do this with Dreamcast vs PS2/GC/Xbox ports, as well as showing off the super detailed DC games such as with Test Drive Le Mans ect.
Image

cloofoofoo
MegaDeath
Posts: 230

Re: Dreamcast compared to its relatives?(pics)

Post#5 » Fri Sep 07, 2018 6:41 am

Anthony817 wrote:Interesting stuff cloofoofoo, would be great if you could do this with Dreamcast vs PS2/GC/Xbox ports, as well as showing off the super detailed DC games such as with Test Drive Le Mans ect.

That's not a bad idea. I guess if I have more insomnia I'll give it a go one of these days. Test drive le man's is not even worth it though, last time I tried it , it barely went over 1 to 1.5 million polygons per second. That was with a bunch a car's on screen. Sorry to burst your bubble. To be honest f335 with 3rd person hack was more impressive around 25,000 to 34,000 per frame at 60 fps.( without hack it's much lower like 10000 to 18,000 per frame)

cloofoofoo
MegaDeath
Posts: 230

Re: Dreamcast compared to its relatives?(pics)

Post#6 » Mon Sep 10, 2018 5:11 pm

I extracted jet set radio models on demul and its jet set radio pc port. Tried to match the camera angle and location as much a possible. While they came out to different triangle count it was by small difference( 57,000 vs 56,000 for the frame)

For the dreamcast Jet set radio was 57,000 polyons.Surprisingly a high polygon pusher( its around 1.7 million triangles @ 30fps):
Image

vs its pc port of 56,000:
Image

scene was something like this on both.
Image

User avatar
segata sanshiro
Dead House
Posts: 379

Re: Dreamcast compared to its relatives?(pics)

Post#7 » Wed Sep 12, 2018 9:05 am

Great thread man, good info. Thank you!

User avatar
Wombat
Dreamcast Swirl
Posts: 527
Contact:

Re: Dreamcast compared to its relatives?(pics)

Post#8 » Wed Sep 12, 2018 4:16 pm

Awesome in depth write up, thanks for this.

TheMadPolarBear
noob
Posts: 4

Re: Dreamcast compared to its relatives?(pics)

Post#9 » Wed Sep 12, 2018 11:14 pm

I’d love to see more of this. Are you able to compare games with PS2 versions? I’m curious to see if any PS2 ports received higher poly/tri counts. Thanks!

  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “Lounge”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot]